From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 10 10:28:09 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54F3716A4B3 for ; Fri, 10 Oct 2003 10:28:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from magnesium.net (toxic.magnesium.net [207.154.84.15]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4E5D043FCB for ; Fri, 10 Oct 2003 10:28:08 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from adamw@magnesium.net) Received: (qmail 93213 invoked by uid 1252); 10 Oct 2003 17:28:08 -0000 Date: 10 Oct 2003 13:28:08 -0400 Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2003 13:28:08 -0400 From: Adam Weinberger To: Thomas-Martin Seck Message-ID: <20031010172808.GL96543@toxic.magnesium.net> References: <3F8618C1.6050602@fillmore-labs.com> <20031010151236.872.qmail@laurel.tmseck.homedns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20031010151236.872.qmail@laurel.tmseck.homedns.org> X-Editor: Vim 6.2 http://www.vim.org X-Mailer: Mutt 1.5 http://www.mutt.org X-URL: http://www.vectors.cx X-ASL: 6/m/behind you User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ports that should use CONFLICTS X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2003 17:28:09 -0000 >> (10.10.2003 @ 1112 PST): Thomas-Martin Seck said, in 1.9K: << > It seems that pkg_add should be tought to ignore unknown declarations in > package files. What does that mean? > > - www/lynx-current conflicts with japanese/lynx, > > japanese/lynx-current, www/lynx > > common files: bin/lynx > > CONFLICTS= ja-lynx-2.8.* lynx-2.8.4.1d > > I beg your pardon, but I do not think anyone will install these in > parallel. This is probably true for every localized port or for ports > that feature a modified version of some software which is - in its stock > version - present in the ports collection too. Whether people are likely to install them in parallel or not is rather irrelevant. The point is that they conflict with each other, and the user should be aware that they will overwrite each other. > > - www/squid24 conflicts with www/squid > > common files: sbin/squid > > CONFLICTS= squid-2.5_4 > > Same here. But since squid-2.4 is not officially supported by the squid > team anymore, I suggest to remove it completely. Regardless, they overwrite each other, and thus a CONFLICTS line should be added. # Adam -- Adam Weinberger vectors.cx >> adam@vectors.cx >> http://www.vectors.cx magnesium.net << adamw@magnesium.net << http://www.magnesium.net/~adamw FreeBSD >> adamw@FreeBSD.org >> http://people.freebsd.org/~adamw #vim:set ts=8: 8-char tabs prevent tooth decay.