From owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 25 21:30:20 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0E4416A4CE for ; Wed, 25 Aug 2004 21:30:20 +0000 (GMT) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6D8F43D4C for ; Wed, 25 Aug 2004 21:30:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i7PLUKMX019424 for ; Wed, 25 Aug 2004 21:30:20 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id i7PLUKHJ019421; Wed, 25 Aug 2004 21:30:20 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2004 21:30:20 GMT Message-Id: <200408252130.i7PLUKHJ019421@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org From: "David S. Madole" Subject: Re: kern/32338: Network to disk write performance low under ATA with DMA X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: "David S. Madole" List-Id: Bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2004 21:30:20 -0000 The following reply was made to PR kern/32338; it has been noted by GNATS. From: "David S. Madole" To: "Tilman Linneweh" , Cc: Subject: Re: kern/32338: Network to disk write performance low under ATA with DMA Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2004 17:05:00 -0400 From: "Tilman Linneweh" > > Synopsis: Network to disk write performance low under ATA with DMA > > State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback > State-Changed-By: arved > State-Changed-When: Wed Aug 25 20:45:41 GMT 2004 > State-Changed-Why: > In the last two years several changes were committed to the sis driver. > Did you test with a recent version of FreeBSD if your problem is fixed? I don't know, as I no longer have a machine running day-to-day that is a good test case. After submitting this, I resigned to the fact that no one was interested, probably rightly so, as the driver is probably not the best place to fix what is really a BIOS PCI bus initialization issue, although there were other drivers, at the time at least, that did this, too. I maintained a local kernel patch for a little while, then realized it's really just as easy to do something like pciconf -w -b pci0:9:0 0xd 0x60 if rc.local, and that's what I did for a long time. In the last few months I have upgraded the machine that was the test case for this and it now has an Intel NIC. David