From owner-freebsd-scsi Thu Nov 11 12: 9:47 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org Received: from caspian.plutotech.com (caspian.plutotech.com [206.168.67.80]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A09F114CA4; Thu, 11 Nov 1999 12:09:34 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gibbs@caspian.plutotech.com) Received: from caspian.plutotech.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by caspian.plutotech.com (8.9.3/8.9.1) with ESMTP id MAA01964; Thu, 11 Nov 1999 12:08:49 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from gibbs@caspian.plutotech.com) Message-Id: <199911111908.MAA01964@caspian.plutotech.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.1.0 09/18/1999 To: Doug Rabson Cc: Matthew Jacob , "Justin T. Gibbs" , Nick Hibma , "Justin T. Gibbs" , scsi@freebsd.org Subject: Re: renaming transactions to openings in cam_sim.c In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 11 Nov 1999 09:46:06 GMT." Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Thu, 11 Nov 1999 12:08:49 -0700 From: "Justin T. Gibbs" Sender: owner-freebsd-scsi@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org >> > >> > I suggest the following name change for consistency. If there are no >> > >> > comments I'll commit it tomorrow. >> > >> >> > >> No. >> > > >> > >:-) No what? No comments? Or no, don't change? >> > > >> > >Nick >> > >> > 1) A 24 hour request for review time-limit is way too short. I frequently >> > get so bogged down with other work that I don't read this list for days >> > at a time. I'm sure I'm not the only one. >> > >> > 2) I see this as a gratuitous change. >> >> It seemd to clarify things for Nick- how about a comment in the source, >> Nick? > >The word 'transactions' always seemed more informative than 'openings' to >me. Yes. 'openings' should only be used for the counters that track capacity, but perhaps even there a better term could be used. -- Justin To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-scsi" in the body of the message