From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 11 23:28:15 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EAAC16A515 for ; Wed, 11 May 2005 23:28:15 +0000 (GMT) Received: from rproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.202]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2F8D43D39 for ; Wed, 11 May 2005 23:28:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from chrcoluk@gmail.com) Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id a41so154133rng for ; Wed, 11 May 2005 16:28:14 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=RTOdfIvhXpGF9wZLnCKRczlejzsLaRFcKUjdn67bAVKBwqyz7xwPjY/eaVbUVa92Ol3+251uEPyvqdXV6ObvUvFlHr2Qvr5HoTwPim6X6WAfsMsnTIntdR1esV1UML5KdpLL92pdzmfBT4YHhQC50qIhjDc6Lht3EaaSoviBeHI= Received: by 10.38.90.51 with SMTP id n51mr499569rnb; Wed, 11 May 2005 16:28:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.39.1.30 with HTTP; Wed, 11 May 2005 16:28:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <3aaaa3a050511162864263c74@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 12 May 2005 00:28:14 +0100 From: Chris To: Marian Hettwer In-Reply-To: <4096.212.12.51.89.1115816916.squirrel@212.12.51.89> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <4281FBC9.5040506@post.pl> <4096.212.12.51.89.1115816916.squirrel@212.12.51.89> cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: SCHED_ULE with SMP broke libpthread/libthr on 5.4-RELEASE X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Chris List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 May 2005 23:28:15 -0000 Seems the 4+ cpu crash fix might have broken it at a guess since RC4 onwards it broke, I am interested in how this goes as I was planning on upgrading a SMP box to 5.4 and ULE this month. Have you guys tried this without SMP? Chris On 5/11/05, Marian Hettwer wrote: > On Mi, 11.05.2005, 14:34, Steven Jurczyk sagte: > > **Using SCHED_ULE on SMP/HT machine broke applications which use > > libpthread/libthr, probably at context switching between threads... The > > applications simply hang and they aren't killable (kill -9 don't > > work).. Usually this also break kernel shutdown (can't flush some inode= s > > or blocks)... > > > right! > I have the same problem. My Kernel is basicly a GENERIC with SMP and ULE > added (4BSD removed). >=20 > ([mhettwer@siteop-8] <~>)$ uname -a > FreeBSD siteop-8.mobile.rz 5.4-STABLE FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE #7: Wed May 11 > 12:03:35 CEST 2005 > root@siteop-8.mobile.rz:/usr/src/sys/i386/compile/SITEOP-8 i386 >=20 > > This is very big problem for people who want use mysql_server on SMP > > machines... > indeed. > The MySQL server won't start and is not killable. I had to switch back to > SCHED_4BSD :-/ >=20 > I would be available for testing packages, as this machine is not in > production. >=20 > it's a dual xeon 2,8 ... you can find detailed information about it at: > http://unixoid.de/freebsd/dmesg.xeon >=20 > :) >=20 > best regards, > Marian > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >