From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 30 17:53:32 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A06B716A400 for ; Sun, 30 Apr 2006 17:53:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marcus@FreeBSD.org) Received: from creme-brulee.marcuscom.com (creme-brulee.marcuscom.com [24.172.16.118]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0994E43D45 for ; Sun, 30 Apr 2006 17:53:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from marcus@FreeBSD.org) Received: from shumai.marcuscom.com (shumai.marcuscom.com [192.168.1.4]) by creme-brulee.marcuscom.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k3UHsxIK031879; Sun, 30 Apr 2006 13:55:00 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from marcus@FreeBSD.org) From: Joe Marcus Clarke To: Stacey Roberts In-Reply-To: <20060430093508.GC3604@crom.vickiandstacey.com> References: <1146349274.16564.18.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> <1146362183.16564.25.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> <20060430093508.GC3604@crom.vickiandstacey.com> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-W418prJYa3gBC9C3qAXo" Organization: FreeBSD, Inc. Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2006 13:53:28 -0400 Message-Id: <1146419608.26519.2.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.4.2.1 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: HEADS UP: GNOME 2.14 being merged into the tree X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2006 17:53:32 -0000 --=-W418prJYa3gBC9C3qAXo Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, 2006-04-30 at 10:35 +0100, Stacey Roberts wrote: > Hello Joe, >=20 > On Sat, 29 Apr 2006, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: >=20 > > On Sat, 2006-04-29 at 18:21 -0400, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: > > > At this late stage of the 5.5/6.1 release cycle, it was deemed that n= one > > > of the packages were going to be rebuilt, so we have been given > > > permission to merge GNOME 2.14 into the ports tree at this time. > > >=20 > > > The first step will be a merge of GStreamer 0.10. When that is > > > complete, the tree will be locked for the GNOME 2.14 merge. The good > > > news is that this latest update no longer comes with the shared libra= ry > > > change for GLib, GTK+, or any other low-level GNOME component, so > > > upgrading will be much easier. > > >=20 > > > I will send out another email when all the dust settles. > >=20 > > Okay, GNOME 2.14 is now in the tree, and things should have settled. > > Please report any problems to gnome@FreeBSD.org. >=20 > Just read UPDATING, and wanted to ask about something, please. >=20 > One of the steps includes: "portupgrade -o x11/gnome-screensaver -f xscre= ensaver-gnome", which > replaces xscreensaver-gnome with gnome-screensaver, yes? >=20 > Are they now both the same in terms of stability and feature-set? >=20 > At present, there are differences between the two whereby xscreensaver-gn= ome provides "Blank > After, Cycle After and Lock Screen After" settings which are not availabl= e in gnome-screensaver. > There is also the fact that there are the "Display Modes" tab as well as = "Advanced" tab in > xscreensaver-gnome, that are not available in gnome-screensaver as well. Then switch back to xscreensaver-gnome. It's not going away. The default screensaver has just switched to gnome-screensaver to be inline with the official GNOME Desktop. Joe --=20 Joe Marcus Clarke FreeBSD GNOME Team :: gnome@FreeBSD.org FreeNode / #freebsd-gnome http://www.FreeBSD.org/gnome --=-W418prJYa3gBC9C3qAXo Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBEVPmYb2iPiv4Uz4cRAjVEAJ0dwNSbY12XCKy2BFj93vdhr3QvHACeMuqf af+wTs6lb4jwjeKCyEi0cAQ= =NxBI -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-W418prJYa3gBC9C3qAXo--