From owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 31 19:53:05 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C6ED16A4CF for ; Tue, 31 Aug 2004 19:53:05 +0000 (GMT) Received: from misty.eyesbeyond.com (glewis.dsl.xmission.com [166.70.56.15]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CE8443D1D for ; Tue, 31 Aug 2004 19:53:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from glewis@eyesbeyond.com) Received: from misty.eyesbeyond.com (localhost.eyesbeyond.com [127.0.0.1]) i7VJr3kf077471; Tue, 31 Aug 2004 13:53:03 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from glewis@eyesbeyond.com) Received: (from glewis@localhost) by misty.eyesbeyond.com (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id i7VJr1qR077470; Tue, 31 Aug 2004 13:53:01 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from glewis@eyesbeyond.com) X-Authentication-Warning: misty.eyesbeyond.com: glewis set sender to glewis@eyesbeyond.com using -f Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2004 13:53:01 -0600 From: Greg Lewis To: Timo Geusch , freebsd-java@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20040831195301.GA77383@misty.eyesbeyond.com> References: <20040829080816.GA86993@odie.unix-consult.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040829080816.GA86993@odie.unix-consult.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Subject: Re: Problem building JDK-1.3.1p9 on recent -current (patch included) X-BeenThere: freebsd-java@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting Java to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2004 19:53:05 -0000 On Sun, Aug 29, 2004 at 09:08:16AM +0100, Timo Geusch wrote: > Apologies if this is a known problem... > > Building JDK13 on -current cvsup'd yesterday fails as the newer C++ compiler > doesn't like some of the C++ code in the plugin directory - see attached error > message. > > The patch fixes the error for me, unfortunately I don't have a scratch > releng_4 box handy to rebuild the JDK there in order to verify that the patch > doesn't break compilation with the older code. The patch itself is simple > enough, it appears that the 'offending' code is already in place but was > commented out. Thanks. I verified the patch against gcc 2.95.4 and have committed it. -- Greg Lewis Email : glewis@eyesbeyond.com Eyes Beyond Web : http://www.eyesbeyond.com Information Technology FreeBSD : glewis@FreeBSD.org