Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 12:21:17 GMT From: Remco Bressers<remco@signet.nl> To: freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org Subject: misc/107706: adding route 10.1000.0.0/24 doesn't result in error but 10.232/24 in the routing table Message-ID: <200701091221.l09CLHed005188@www.freebsd.org> Resent-Message-ID: <200701091230.l09CUEMq041290@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>Number: 107706 >Category: misc >Synopsis: adding route 10.1000.0.0/24 doesn't result in error but 10.232/24 in the routing table >Confidential: no >Severity: non-critical >Priority: low >Responsible: freebsd-bugs >State: open >Quarter: >Keywords: >Date-Required: >Class: sw-bug >Submitter-Id: current-users >Arrival-Date: Tue Jan 09 12:30:13 GMT 2007 >Closed-Date: >Last-Modified: >Originator: Remco Bressers >Release: 6.1-RELEASE >Organization: Signet B.V. >Environment: FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE #0: Sun May 7 04:42:56 UTC 2006 root@opus.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/SMP i386 >Description: By accident i created a route : # route -n add -net 10.1000.0.0/24 192.168.168.1 This didn't result in an error as expected (10.1000.0.0 isn't really possible :)) but resulted in the following entry in the routing table : 10.232/24 192.168.168.1 UGS 0 0 bge0 Ofcourse, this seems like a very minor bug in the routing table implementation, but worth mentioning. Regards, Remco Bressers Signet B.V. >How-To-Repeat: # route -n add -net 10.1000.0.0/24 192.168.168.1 >Fix: >Release-Note: >Audit-Trail: >Unformatted:
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200701091221.l09CLHed005188>