Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 30 Mar 1996 13:53:28 -0700 (MST)
From:      Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org>
To:        green@fang.cs.sunyit.edu (Charles Green)
Cc:        smpatel@wam.umd.edu, hackers@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: UNIX Sound SystemTM (USS) Lite (Formerly VoxWare)
Message-ID:  <199603302053.NAA09714@phaeton.artisoft.com>
In-Reply-To: <199603301814.NAA01406@fang.cs.sunyit.edu> from "Charles Green" at Mar 30, 96 01:14:36 pm

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>         Ok, I can agree with keeping the old version (3.5?). But is it
> particularly necessary to continue  a separate developement? This could 
> result in diverging APIs. I understand that the idea is to keep the same 
> API but people's best intentions have a tendancy to get lost. Hanuu will 
> add a feature, the FreeBSD developer says "Hey, we don't need that. But we 
> do need xxxx". Now we have two different diverging APIs. Not to mention
> adding more work for someone out there in FreeBSD land.
> 	What I suggest, if possible, create a port to add support for USS 
> Lite. There has to be a compromise, somewhere. I really don't think we
> should just say "We will NEVER use it!". That's like cutting your nose
> off to spite your face.

A port or a package?

Remember that it is impossible to distribute a precompiled LKM under the
new terms.

>         Perhaps we should consult Hannu before continuing this debate?
> After all, there are no commercial incarnations of FreeBSD.

What happens when there are?  I know that much of the code is seeing
commercial use in bits and pieces elsewhere.  Much of my FS work is
a side effect of work I am paid for by my employer (we've ported the
Heidemann FS framework to Windows 95), and I would be suprised if
some of the networking code weren't in the same boat.  Certainly,
the free install comes from work Jordan gets paid for, directly or
indirectly, by Walnut Creek.

Just because there is not a commercial distribution, like Caldera's
Linux (or there isn't yet, anway), doesn't mean that we should back
ourselves into a corner prohibiting something like that *ever*
happening by making a compromize agreement with Hannu to get wider
distribution rights.


					Terry Lambert
					terry@lambert.org
---
Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present
or previous employers.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199603302053.NAA09714>