From owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 15 13:14:28 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-src@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0ADF137B401; Fri, 15 Aug 2003 13:14:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from storm.FreeBSD.org.uk (storm.FreeBSD.org.uk [194.242.157.42]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90C6B43FDF; Fri, 15 Aug 2003 13:14:26 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mark@grondar.org) Received: from storm.FreeBSD.org.uk (Ugrondar@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by storm.FreeBSD.org.uk (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h7FKEPHo074163; Fri, 15 Aug 2003 21:14:25 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from mark@grondar.org) Received: (from Ugrondar@localhost)h7FKEOZL074162; Fri, 15 Aug 2003 21:14:24 +0100 (BST) X-Authentication-Warning: storm.FreeBSD.org.uk: Ugrondar set sender to mark@grondar.org using -f Received: from grondar.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])h7FK18OI004345; Fri, 15 Aug 2003 21:01:08 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from mark@grondar.org) From: Mark Murray Message-Id: <200308152001.h7FK18OI004345@grimreaper.grondar.org> To: "Poul-Henning Kamp" In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 15 Aug 2003 21:22:23 +0200." <12187.1060975343@critter.freebsd.dk> Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2003 21:01:07 +0100 Sender: mark@grondar.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.2 required=5.0 tests=EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,FROM_NO_LOWER,IN_REP_TO, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REPLY_WITH_QUOTES version=2.55 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.55 (1.174.2.19-2003-05-19-exp) cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/libkern arc4random.c X-BeenThere: cvs-src@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the src tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2003 20:14:28 -0000 "Poul-Henning Kamp" writes: > We should actually have a script in src/tools/regression which ran > some or all of the stuff from http://csrc.nist.gov/rng/ on our > various random sources... Yes. It could at least raise alarms if the code suddenly starts to no longer be statistically random. M -- Mark Murray iumop ap!sdn w,I idlaH