From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 8 06:58:43 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85EDA16A4C7; Mon, 8 May 2006 06:58:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ed@hoeg.nl) Received: from palm.hoeg.nl (mx0.hoeg.nl [83.98.131.211]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E298043D6E; Mon, 8 May 2006 06:58:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ed@hoeg.nl) Received: by palm.hoeg.nl (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 1A1F017101; Mon, 8 May 2006 08:58:41 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 08:58:41 +0200 From: Ed Schouten To: "Bruce A. Mah" Message-ID: <20060508065841.GN15353@hoeg.nl> References: <20060506172742.GM15353@hoeg.nl> <445EC341.60406@freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="arYKMy5bKB/hcRo6" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <445EC341.60406@freebsd.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Cc: FreeBSD Net Subject: Re: nd6_lookup prints bogus messages with point to point devices X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 May 2006 06:58:44 -0000 --arYKMy5bKB/hcRo6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello Bruce, * Bruce A. Mah wrote: > I think that suz@ and ume@ are the people who have worked in this area > most recently, hopefully one of them will speak up. You didn't give a > lot of details...please give (at a minimum) the version of FreeBSD > you're using and more details about the interface over which you're > having this problem. >=20 > I saw this on RELENG_6 sometime after some IPv6 ND changes that were > merged in late last year. I have a gif(4) tunnel to my ISP over which I > do IPv6. The GIF tunnel was originally configured as a point-to-point > interface and I got the same messages you mentioned. My workaround was > to configure the gif(4) interface as a /127, which was obviously only > possible because the two interface addresses on each end of the tunnel > just happened to differ only in their least-significant bits. (I know > this isn't the right solution.) I'm seeing the messages on the machine in Eindhoven (running RELENG_6 =66rom a few days/weeks ago), but they also show up on my HEAD machine at home. Below is the output of `ifconfig gif0` on my machine at home: | gif0: flags=3D8051 mtu 1280 | tunnel inet 83.181.147.170 --> 193.109.122.244 | inet6 fe80::202:a5ff:fe58:4927%gif0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x7=20 | inet6 2001:7b8:310::1 --> 2001:7b8:2ff:a4::1 prefixlen 128=20 As far as I know, the latest FreeBSD releases show an error message when assigning an address with a non-128 prefixlen. --=20 Ed Schouten WWW: http://g-rave.nl/ --arYKMy5bKB/hcRo6 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFEXuwg52SDGA2eCwURAiqTAJ9mKqasKfUYn4z1IptYKqorsxgecACcClUl JrWdrEIxkttt/bAlCTFhMzc= =fHy7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --arYKMy5bKB/hcRo6--