From owner-freebsd-scsi Tue Apr 20 4:22:13 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org Received: from sand2.sentex.ca (sand2.sentex.ca [209.167.248.3]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F257715359 for ; Tue, 20 Apr 1999 04:22:11 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Received: from gravel (ospf-wat.sentex.net [209.167.248.81]) by sand2.sentex.ca (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id HAA05287 for ; Tue, 20 Apr 1999 07:19:44 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Message-Id: <4.1.19990420072456.04ffc960@granite.sentex.ca> X-Sender: mdtancsa@granite.sentex.ca X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.1 Date: Tue, 20 Apr 1999 07:29:26 -0400 To: freebsd-scsi@FreeBSD.ORG From: Mike Tancsa Subject: Re: -STABLE isn't stable - SCSI *and* Ethernet ... In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: owner-freebsd-scsi@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org At 12:27 AM 4/20/99 , The Hermit Hacker wrote: > > >Wow...what a mistake this past couple of days have been...the other day, >figuring that after ~3months, it might be time to re-sync with -STABLE, >figuring that, by its very name, this should be a safe thing to do... Did you do an upgrade, or a fresh install ? I have a couple of machines in production that are on the STABLE branch and so far so good. But they use the a 2940U2W and the fxp cards. Apart from the very dangerous DOS still there they have been humming along (knock on wood). But since they are for internal use only (i.e. the general customer population do not have access to them) I am not too worried. What SCSI controller are you using ? ---Mike ********************************************************************** Mike Tancsa, Network Admin * mike@sentex.net Sentex Communications Corp, * http://www.sentex.net/mike Cambridge, Ontario * 01.519.651.3400 Canada * To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-scsi" in the body of the message