Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 3 May 2016 02:02:45 -0400
From:      Steve Wills <swills@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com>
Cc:        FreeBSD PowerPC ML <freebsd-ppc@freebsd.org>, FreeBSD Current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>, Scott Long <scottl@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: wired memory leak at r298785
Message-ID:  <57283F05.80305@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <CANCZdfronkF5EyiZ=wHfH-ApBYrMTOS2LeTCyLDm9MTEno2=hA@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <572756DF.1010809@FreeBSD.org> <5727F71E.20101@FreeBSD.org> <CANCZdfronkF5EyiZ=wHfH-ApBYrMTOS2LeTCyLDm9MTEno2=hA@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 05/ 2/16 11:24 PM, Warner Losh wrote:
> 
> 
> On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 6:55 PM, Steve Wills <swills@freebsd.org
> <mailto:swills@freebsd.org>> wrote:
> 
>     Hi,
> 
>     On 05/ 2/16 09:32 AM, Steve Wills wrote:
>     > Hi,
>     >
>     > Just did my monthly update and r298785 seems to be leaking wired
>     memory
>     > rather rapidly. My system has 8gb of RAM and the amount of wired
>     memory
>     > just goes up and up continuously. It takes about 12 hours before it
>     > exhausts all the RAM and sort of locks up (though shutdown still
>     works).
>     >
>     > I also made one other change to the system at the same time as
>     updating,
>     > which was to add another disk and configure it using ZFS. Perhaps this
>     > is a ZFS on PowerPC64 issue? My amd64 box running the same rev of
>     > CURRENT doesn't have the issue.
>     >
> 
>     I've rebooted the box and started repeatedly logging the output of
>     vmstat -m. It seems to show CAM CCB using a lot of memory and growing
>     rather rapidly. For example, here's a few lines of diff output:
> 
>     - CAM CCB 91418 182836K - 187149 2048
>     + CAM CCB 447070 894140K - 900292 2048
> 
>     from two samples that are 60 minutes apart.
> 
>     The box is isn't terribly busy, it's just running the monitoring daemons
>     running (snmpd, collectd), whatever web requests are hitting it (very
>     few if any), this logging process, and my shell, etc.
> 
>     Could this be related to recent changes in CURRENT?
> 
>     Copying Scott and Warner in case they have comments on this since I'm
>     told they have been active in this area recently.
> 
> 
> I've been looking into it. I'm not sure what's up since I don't see it
> in production. I'll give it a bump in priority though.
> 

Thanks! I did notice that killing bsnmpd drastically slowed the rate of
growth, but didn't completely eliminate it.

Steve



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?57283F05.80305>