From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Dec 30 17:57:08 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id RAA02626 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Wed, 30 Dec 1998 17:57:08 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from pop.uniserve.com (pop.uniserve.com [204.244.156.3]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id RAA02621 for ; Wed, 30 Dec 1998 17:57:06 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tom@uniserve.com) Received: from shell.uniserve.ca [204.244.186.218] by pop.uniserve.com with smtp (Exim 1.82 #4) id 0zvXLC-0002W0-00; Wed, 30 Dec 1998 17:55:58 -0800 Date: Wed, 30 Dec 1998 17:55:55 -0800 (PST) From: Tom X-Sender: tom@shell.uniserve.ca To: Mike Tancsa cc: rcramer@sytex.net, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Sendmail 8.9.1a In-Reply-To: <3.0.5.32.19981230194536.01b10900@granite.sentex.ca> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Wed, 30 Dec 1998, Mike Tancsa wrote: > At 07:27 PM 12/30/98 -0500, Richard Cramer wrote: > >> > >> Considering that 2.2.8-STABLE has roughly two and a half weeks to > >> live, bringing 8.9.1 into 2.2 would be silly. :) > > > > What do you mean that 2.2.8-STABLE has two and a half weeks to live? > > I think what is meant by the above is that 3.0 will spawn off into the new > 'stable' and that the present 2.2.stable branch will only see critical bug > fixes. 2.2-stable has only seen critical bug fixes for a several months yet. Even 2.1-stable still gets the occasional critical bug fixes. FreeBSD branches do not die, they just cease to be maintained. > ---Mike > ********************************************************************** > Mike Tancsa, Network Admin * mike@sentex.net > Sentex Communications Corp, * http://www.sentex.net/mike > Cambridge, Ontario * 01.519.651.3400 > Canada * Tom To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message