From owner-freebsd-net Thu Jan 30 2:12: 6 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BE3937B401 for ; Thu, 30 Jan 2003 02:12:05 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.otel.net (gw3.OTEL.net [212.36.8.151]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75B1443F3F for ; Thu, 30 Jan 2003 02:12:03 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ikostov@otel.net) Received: from judicator.otel.net ([212.36.9.113]) by mail.otel.net with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1) id 18eBf9-000DIG-00; Thu, 30 Jan 2003 12:11:15 +0200 Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2003 12:11:15 +0200 (EET) From: Iasen Kostov To: Dave Cornejo Cc: Jason Hunt , Subject: Re: unique routing problem In-Reply-To: <200301300329.h0U3TkP4003640@white.dogwood.com> Message-ID: <20030130120936.B85437-100000@shadowhand.OTEL.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Wed, 29 Jan 2003, Dave Cornejo wrote: > We have this running on Linux, but it's my belief that we're actually > exploiting a bug or flaw in the Linux routing. The closest I've > gotten is to set add a route like this on .1: > > .1 has a netmask of 0xffffffff > > route add 192.168.1.2 -interface fxp0 should be : route add 192.168.1.2/32 -cloning -iface fxp0 or will never get arp address To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message