From owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 19 01:17:21 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: cvs-src@freebsd.org Delivered-To: cvs-src@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1A8A16A41F for ; Mon, 19 Dec 2005 01:17:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail2.fluidhosting.com (mail2.fluidhosting.com [204.14.90.12]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3F1D343D49 for ; Mon, 19 Dec 2005 01:17:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: (qmail 94506 invoked by uid 399); 19 Dec 2005 01:17:20 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO ?192.168.1.101?) (dougb@dougbarton.us@127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 19 Dec 2005 01:17:20 -0000 Message-ID: <43A60A1F.4090200@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 17:17:19 -0800 From: Doug Barton Organization: http://www.FreeBSD.org/ User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (X11/20051203) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Alexander Leidinger References: <200512102021.jBAKLk0v038487@repoman.freebsd.org> <1134253112.61298.9.camel@S01060080c83f4fb0.su.shawcable.net> <439B5E83.1090702@FreeBSD.org> <20051211165514.49001ea3@Magellan.Leidinger.net> In-Reply-To: <20051211165514.49001ea3@Magellan.Leidinger.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: cvs-src@freebsd.org, Adam Gregoire Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/etc rc src/etc/defaults rc.conf src/etc/rc.d devfs dumpon initrandom rcconf.sh resolv src/share/man/man5 rc.conf.5 src/share/man/man8 diskless.8 X-BeenThere: cvs-src@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the src tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 01:17:22 -0000 Alexander Leidinger wrote: > On Sat, 10 Dec 2005 15:02:27 -0800 > Doug Barton wrote: > >> Adam Gregoire wrote: >> >>> A diff for the addition of rcconf.sh to Obsoletefiles.inc. >> Thanks. I want to hold off on that till we're 100% sure it can go away. I'm >> about 95% sure now. > > Just a little thing to think about: where do we want to handle this, in > mergemaster, or in ObsoleteFiles.inc? Sorry it took so long to get back to you on this. Including the files in the obsolete file list won't hurt anything, and could make mergemaster easier for those that use the obsolete file service. Doug -- This .signature sanitized for your protection