From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 10 04:41:09 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE7F016A4DE for ; Mon, 10 Jul 2006 04:41:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from spork@bway.net) Received: from mail.bway.net (xena.bway.net [216.220.96.26]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35CC943D46 for ; Mon, 10 Jul 2006 04:41:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from spork@bway.net) Received: (qmail 99569 invoked by uid 0); 10 Jul 2006 04:41:08 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO white.nat.fasttrackmonkey.com) (spork@bway.net@216.220.116.154) by smtp.bway.net with (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted) SMTP; 10 Jul 2006 04:41:08 -0000 Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2006 00:41:07 -0400 (EDT) From: Charles Sprickman X-X-Sender: spork@white.nat.fasttrackmonkey.com To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20060708085132.GD98476@over-yonder.net> Message-ID: References: <20060708085132.GD98476@over-yonder.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Subject: Re: 6.1 quota issues X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2006 04:41:10 -0000 On Sat, 8 Jul 2006, Matthew D. Fuller wrote: > On Fri, Jul 07, 2006 at 10:56:47PM -0400 I heard the voice of > Charles Sprickman, and lo! it spake thus: >> >> Trying again, it reported the same inconsistencies then sat there >> for more than an hour taking up all the available CPU on the box >> until I killed it. The mtime on quota.user had not changed during >> the run. > > FWIW, I saw this on a box I setup running a late November -CURRENT > last year; I could never get the quotas setup and running right > because the check always just looped itself up. The partition they're > on has about 3 gig used out of ~45, with maybe a dozen users. I never > spent much time on it, since it's just a personal box, and the quotas > are mostly just to provide a handy measure of who's using what (no > limits set). I just gave it up and decided to worry about it later. What should I do here? It's consistently failing. What information should I gather to forumulate a PR that won't burden the assignee with lots of troubleshooting mess? The machine is not in production, but there is user data on it. I could allow a trusted developer access to it, or even create another jail to illustrate the problem. Thanks, Charles > > -- > Matthew Fuller (MF4839) | fullermd@over-yonder.net > Systems/Network Administrator | http://www.over-yonder.net/~fullermd/ > On the Internet, nobody can hear you scream. >