Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 10 May 2001 01:48:21 -0700
From:      Michael Haro <mharo@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Matt Dillon <dillon@earth.backplane.com>, Brian Somers <brian@Awfulhak.org>, ports@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: src/etc rc
Message-ID:  <20010510014821.A35207@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <20010510094300.C4494@ringworld.oblivion.bg>; from roam@orbitel.bg on Thu, May 10, 2001 at 09:43:00AM %2B0300
References:  <200105090803.f49833B84293@hak.lan.Awfulhak.org> <200105092021.f49KLdT99914@earth.backplane.com> <20010510094300.C4494@ringworld.oblivion.bg>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, May 10, 2001 at 09:43:00AM +0300, Peter Pentchev wrote:
> > 
> >     Yes.  /var/run should be wiped completely.  Programs needing 
> >     persistent /var storage should use /var/db.  That's why we have
> >     a /var/db separate from a /var/run.
> 
> Just as an aside, irrelevant to the whole /etc/rc discussion: does
> this mean that the security/sudo port should keep its tty tickets
> in /var/db/sudo, not /var/run/sudo as it currently does?  Or are those
> also meant to expire at shutdown?

Since this directory is used for timestamps that expire in a short period
of time, I see no problem with it being wiped by /etc/rc and thus it
should be left in /var/run.  If you disagree, I could move the directory
to /var/db.

Opinions?

Michael


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010510014821.A35207>