Date: Thu, 30 Sep 1999 16:40:07 +0000 From: Edwin Culp <eculp@MexComUSA.net> To: Bill Paul <wpaul@skynet.ctr.columbia.edu> Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Linksys LNE100TX Message-ID: <37F39267.EC5FE001@MexComUSA.net> References: <199909301557.LAA04658@skynet.ctr.columbia.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Bill Paul wrote: > Of all the gin joints in all the towns in all the world, Edwin Culp had > to walk into mine and say: > > > Fry´s was out of Intel 100/10 ethernet cards, so I bought a Linksys > > LNE100TX remembering that I there was a driver for it. > > No, you bought an LNE100TX v2.0, forgetting that there's a different > driver for it. :) (Isn't it great how the "v2.0" part is written in > such tiny letters on the box?) You´re right, I would have never seen it. Thanks. > > > > I added > > device pn0 > > The v2.0 card uses a chip labeled 82C115 which is supposed to be a > "PNIC II." It's really more like a new generation of the Macronix > MX98715A: the EEPROM access mechanism is different, and it supports > an internal SYM port, 10baseT port and NWAY as opposed to MII. > (Actually, the Macronix chips are much closer to the actual DEC > register interface than the PNIC.) Since it bears more resemblance > to the Macronix chips than to the original PNIC, I added the support > for it to the mx driver instead of the pn driver. > > Translation: try device mx0 instead. You don't need controller miibus0 > for this driver as I haven't converted it yet (I still haven't figured > out what to do with the internal NWAY support). Did it and got these messages: mx0: <LC82C115 PNIC II 10/100BaseTX> at device 16.0 on pci0 mx0: couldn't map ports/memory device_probe_and_attach: mx0 attach returned 6 I must be missing something else. Thanks, ed > > > -Bill > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?37F39267.EC5FE001>