From owner-freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 10 14:57:56 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DC0FA52 for ; Tue, 10 Sep 2013 14:57:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Received: from mail-qe0-f51.google.com (mail-qe0-f51.google.com [209.85.128.51]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0CEAD2143 for ; Tue, 10 Sep 2013 14:57:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qe0-f51.google.com with SMTP id ne12so4388184qeb.38 for ; Tue, 10 Sep 2013 07:57:54 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:subject:mime-version:content-type:from :in-reply-to:date:cc:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references :to; bh=bVCfSjH4jhtcB+Li/K/FZ5r/qXIwATpuvCQCse3EEoQ=; b=CJTc5Omhjg1cHE3qIYQTMETzp3clNwZduj2DN9CphIQWSGU1PQSuQeofUvuthOKXOI Mo3voaQwcVXTbWIsaZf6fkHs7wusYPjbw5o45rOeBtk62HtIaUcWAwBi+7n3Z1924YP3 nQ/KNTKBF30f70J4hD3Ia4ioCgDo57IaLjEgMn4WW/pG0Tqm5tzMrb9+wjELiIVnfATd mgwXlemmbduGMP6itmBD0zLbxGNM177Eez1jkyfqKr3TwAyEx/VR0tTHNquagQjHXSle Taq5QgTdxniLCAcNH8PdStQffsHQldAhAx2lnV7qI+8a2sc4GQetIaaMwo+LFDAFYSmU DYMg== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkQb5cHgR0Hx4UwOTDhS8ZJkKG5OYPtgyDyoIPj3mbRYRivlVuG6IVPe6FkpLUAsqSVlX0+ X-Received: by 10.229.251.201 with SMTP id mt9mr3890109qcb.26.1378823660241; Tue, 10 Sep 2013 07:34:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from monkey-bot.int.fusionio.com ([209.117.142.2]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id a7sm35415318qew.2.1969.12.31.16.00.00 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 10 Sep 2013 07:34:19 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Warner Losh Subject: Re: armv6eb broken? Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1085) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: Warner Losh In-Reply-To: <20130910093724.2be6332c@bender.Home> Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2013 08:34:17 -0600 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <522E47B1.2070904@delphij.net> <20130910093724.2be6332c@bender.Home> To: Andrew Turner X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1085) Cc: David Chisnall , "freebsd-arm@freebsd.org" , d@delphij.net X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the StrongARM Processor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2013 14:57:56 -0000 On Sep 10, 2013, at 2:37 AM, Andrew Turner wrote: > On Mon, 09 Sep 2013 15:12:01 -0700 > Xin Li wrote: >=20 >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >> Hash: SHA512 >>=20 >> Hi, >>=20 >> It seems that 'make tinderbox' is still broken for armv6eb, citing >> missing __sync_fetch_and_add_4 referenced in librt.so. I have no = idea >> on how to fix this though :-/ >=20 > My opinion is we should remove the armv6eb target. It was unsupported > by llvm & clang the last time I looked, and, as far as I can tell, we > have no boards that use it. Then what's triggering it? Just the tinderbox? If it is just the = tinderbox, let's remove it from there, but keep it in the rest of the = tree, since there's some tricky bits I did to make it compile in the = first place... Just because clang/llvm don't support it doesn't mean we = should actively remove the support from the rest of the system. External = tool chains do. Warner