From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 22 11:04:48 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B01216A433; Fri, 22 Jul 2005 11:04:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from tim.des.no (tim.des.no [194.63.250.121]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 438B643D91; Fri, 22 Jul 2005 11:04:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from tim.des.no (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spam.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62B0B60FE; Fri, 22 Jul 2005 13:04:33 +0200 (CEST) Received: from xps.des.no (des.no [80.203.228.37]) by tim.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 449A360F1; Fri, 22 Jul 2005 13:04:33 +0200 (CEST) Received: by xps.des.no (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 205A533CE6; Fri, 22 Jul 2005 13:04:33 +0200 (CEST) To: Robert Watson References: <20050721134816.GA8550@nagual.pp.ru> <20050722011556.T16902@fledge.watson.org> From: des@des.no (=?iso-8859-1?q?Dag-Erling_Sm=F8rgrav?=) Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2005 13:04:33 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20050722011556.T16902@fledge.watson.org> (Robert Watson's message of "Fri, 22 Jul 2005 01:17:52 +0100 (BST)") Message-ID: <861x5rqeym.fsf@xps.des.no> User-Agent: Gnus/5.110002 (No Gnus v0.2) Emacs/21.3 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Tests: ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Learn: ham X-Spam-Score: -5.2/5.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.4 (2005-06-05) on tim.des.no Cc: wpaul@ctr.columbia.edu, current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: rl(4) is not ready for mpsafenet net enough? (silent reboots) X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2005 11:04:48 -0000 Robert Watson writes: > I can't speak to the specifics of the driver, as I neither use it nor > have any if_rl hardware. However, you should know that because > debug.mpsafenet=3D0 also changes quite a bit of timing, not just lock > coverage, it's not necessarily a locking problem. Out of curiousity, > if you take "options PREEMPTION" out, but leave debug.mpsafenet=3D1, do > things change? I have a box with rl hardware and mpsafenet enabled. No problems so far, but it's not under heavy load. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no