Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 23 Mar 2015 14:57:11 +0100
From:      Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Bryan Drewery <bdrewery@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        Sunpoet Po-Chuan Hsieh <sunpoet@FreeBSD.org>, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org>, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: svn commit: r381955 - head/graphics/gdal
Message-ID:  <20150323135711.GB27378@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net>
In-Reply-To: <550F8505.8010600@FreeBSD.org>
References:  <201503222011.t2MKBHq7091087@svn.freebsd.org> <20150323015759.GA34402@FreeBSD.org> <550F8505.8010600@FreeBSD.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--9zSXsLTf0vkW971A
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 10:14:13PM -0500, Bryan Drewery wrote:
> On 3/22/2015 8:58 PM, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
> > On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 08:11:17PM +0000, Sunpoet Po-Chuan Hsieh wrote:
> >> New Revision: 381955
> >> URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/381955
> >> QAT: https://qat.redports.org/buildarchive/r381955/
> >>
> >> Log:
> >>   - Use -lpthread instead of -pthread
> >=20
> > Is -pthread going away anytime soon?  I'm a bit worried of more alike
> > changing one to another; since they're identical right now on FreeBSD,
> > I'd rather reduce amount of patching, leaving whatever is picked by
> > upstream, unless -lpthread really should be preferred over -pthread
> > for some reason I'm unaware of (and ready to learn about).
> >=20
> > ./danfe
> >=20
>=20
> It's a pointless change. Tijl explains here
> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D198116#c4
>=20

This is not pointless at all this is a long standing thing that should be
cleaned out for a while, portmgr already gave long ago some blanket to some
developers to remove that along with all usage of PTHREAD_LIBS. The reason =
is
that it is confusing for maintainers, as if they take example on some of our
existing ports they might be driven in the wrong direction.

Working in cleaning up those is imho important

Regards,
Bapt

--9zSXsLTf0vkW971A
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1

iEYEARECAAYFAlUQG7cACgkQ8kTtMUmk6Exz+gCguSpaCVjJ+06NUplMI28432PN
Cs0AnjBIPoQzqkXs2fp48QfqWQCvyAcx
=VePG
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--9zSXsLTf0vkW971A--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20150323135711.GB27378>