From owner-freebsd-apache@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 7 20:32:17 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apache@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1511610656C7; Fri, 7 Jan 2011 20:32:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ohauer@FreeBSD.org) Received: from u18-124.dslaccess.de (unknown [194.231.39.124]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B41E28FC0C; Fri, 7 Jan 2011 20:32:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [172.20.1.100] (unknown [172.20.1.100]) by u18-124.dslaccess.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2A294205E4; Fri, 7 Jan 2011 21:32:12 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <4D277939.6040801@FreeBSD.org> Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2011 21:36:09 +0100 From: Olli Hauer User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101207 Thunderbird/3.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Philip M. Gollucci" References: <4D243209.5040703@FreeBSD.org> <4D24BED1.7070004@p6m7g8.com> <4D265CF2.5090208@FreeBSD.org> <4D26B3C6.4050804@p6m7g8.com> <4D272510.9030908@FreeBSD.org> <4D275E83.2000204@p6m7g8.com> <4D276AF6.5090804@FreeBSD.org> <4D276FB6.6000503@p6m7g8.com> In-Reply-To: <4D276FB6.6000503@p6m7g8.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: ohauer@FreeBSD.org, "Philip M. Gollucci" , apache@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: question about PR: ports/147009: Mk/bsd.apache.mk: [patch] default to www/apache22 X-BeenThere: freebsd-apache@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: ohauer@FreeBSD.org List-Id: Support of apache-related ports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2011 20:32:17 -0000 On 2011-01-07 20:55, Philip M. Gollucci wrote: > On 01/07/11 19:35, Olli Hauer wrote: >> No, I think the fail is valid, since this was the second test case, >> where I defined *"APACHE_PORT= www/apache22"* in /etc/make.conf! > You know come to think of it, if you have APACHE_PORT=www/apache22 (now) > in /etc/make.conf it does fail it it doesn't match. Thats b/c > www/apache* conflict with each other so thats valid. > > Looks like I eat my previous words. > >> http://people.freebsd.org/~ohauer/diffs/PR_147009_ports__Mk__bsd.apache.mk.diff > I think one addition might be useful near the top of bsd.apache.mk > > DEFAULT_APACHE_VERSION= 22 > > lower in your patch reuse that variable. > +APACHE_VERSION= ${DEFAULT_APACHE_VERSION} > > The next goal after this and after 24 is ga would be to bump the default > version sometime near next january I'd think. > Ok, patch is updated with the requested additions. Um, do you mean you will bump the default version to 24?