From owner-freebsd-bugs Wed Jun 12 01:07:10 1996 Return-Path: owner-bugs Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id BAA06767 for bugs-outgoing; Wed, 12 Jun 1996 01:07:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from time.cdrom.com (time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id BAA06762; Wed, 12 Jun 1996 01:07:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.7.5/8.6.9) with SMTP id BAA29119; Wed, 12 Jun 1996 01:06:22 -0700 (PDT) To: Tom Samplonius cc: "Jordan K. Hubbard" , freebsd-bugs@freefall.freebsd.org Subject: Re: docs/633 In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 12 Jun 1996 00:05:51 PDT." Date: Wed, 12 Jun 1996 01:06:22 -0700 Message-ID: <29116.834566782@time.cdrom.com> From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Sender: owner-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk "ndbm" is a backwards-compatible naming convention. "dbm" is the actual library these days which has long since taken on all the special features of "ndbm" Jordan > > On Sun, 3 Mar 1996, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote: > > > Synopsis: no manpage for ndbm > > > > State-Changed-From-To: open-closed > > State-Changed-By: jkh > > State-Changed-When: Sun Mar 3 01:01:59 PST 1996 > > State-Changed-Why: > > This man page isn't even supposed to exist, and it's the actual > > references to it which are in error. > > Why? There is an ndbm.h include, and there are ndbm procs in libc. > Shouldn't that be documented? > > Tom