From owner-freebsd-current  Mon Jun 23 11:36:13 1997
Return-Path: <owner-current>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id LAA21007
          for current-outgoing; Mon, 23 Jun 1997 11:36:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from phaeton.artisoft.com (phaeton.Artisoft.COM [198.17.250.50])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id LAA20999
          for <current@FreeBSD.ORG>; Mon, 23 Jun 1997 11:36:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from terry@localhost) by phaeton.artisoft.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) id LAA01074; Mon, 23 Jun 1997 11:23:25 -0700
From: Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org>
Message-Id: <199706231823.LAA01074@phaeton.artisoft.com>
Subject: Re: Hmmmm, this is new..
To: rkw@dataplex.net (Richard Wackerbarth)
Date: Mon, 23 Jun 1997 11:23:25 -0700 (MST)
Cc: julian@whistle.com, jdp@polstra.com, bde@zeta.org.au, jkh@time.cdrom.com,
        current@FreeBSD.ORG
In-Reply-To: <l03102800afd36b4001c1@[208.2.87.4]> from "Richard Wackerbarth" at Jun 22, 97 06:54:28 pm
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-current@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> >OSF1 builds a separate copy of usr/include and usr/lib
> >within the obj tree specifically to use for this.
> 
> This is the kind of approach that we need to take in order to allow a build
> to be done on a multi-user or production machine without destroying the
> underlying system.

Or a cross environment.


					Terry Lambert
					terry@lambert.org
---
Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present
or previous employers.