From owner-freebsd-virtualization@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 28 23:20:11 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D39CC233; Tue, 28 May 2013 23:20:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from outbackdingo@gmail.com) Received: from mail-oa0-f46.google.com (mail-oa0-f46.google.com [209.85.219.46]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8232D201; Tue, 28 May 2013 23:20:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-oa0-f46.google.com with SMTP id h2so10837883oag.33 for ; Tue, 28 May 2013 16:20:10 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=76aqlEgSLgZKQz61HoiLpwcekGgZsWplRIhP5qzYz7c=; b=EOR2PcCf89fw5QtJZ/Q1+yNOK+uNDfyRYOd1pjvmDvUlz5c/pUZzxnSmaAvrl1iFZf 731aJDo1CnCavBRfkOC/Rm1n2zQ6VCXb+dPAGjrIh0GglhtV373MTyBFvvXTFOVDxO3S 7/ReXbe8cPuId4JhYDs4tDV3UTpGjLg3zdntmG7Z7HGJyx5lsPOEOVJ+oKn9BFFS8N8+ 6EaKfFfzyM9nlLc3ZpUm4mi1Jm2pwZrjAmvPaHSX9yt4o7QPBBPSPz5wjBdgAr9iToon iw2v8utXNEfUPbGNMZ2A6RCGo20Dg9yzGYzVO28hdvs58vbBZOOqv6DaT1AC8wdcriXE NG7A== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.60.102.145 with SMTP id fo17mr35764oeb.76.1369783210747; Tue, 28 May 2013 16:20:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.76.152.225 with HTTP; Tue, 28 May 2013 16:20:10 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <519131D8.9010307@citrix.com> <647F6650-AEED-4784-8A45-98324860EE0A@dckd.nl> <519E1A0C.3070609@citrix.com> Date: Tue, 28 May 2013 19:20:10 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: FreeBSD PVHVM call for testing From: Outback Dingo To: Craig Rodrigues Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 Cc: "freebsd-xen@freebsd.org" , "xen-users@lists.xen.org" , xen-devel , "freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion of various virtualization techniques FreeBSD supports." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 May 2013 23:20:11 -0000 On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 7:09 PM, Craig Rodrigues wrote: > > > > On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 3:43 PM, Outback Dingo wrote: > >> >> I wrote a blog post specifically for installing 10-CURRENT from a >>> snapshot ISO and getting bootstrapped >>> from there, to help the Google Summer of Code Student that I am >>> mentoring. >>> What specifically do you want to be backported to 9-STABLE? >>> >> >> Yes Ive seen the post, however we have a hard requirement for 9-STABLE >> for some development work we are >> currently involved in. And I would prefer not to move our current >> infrastructure for development to CURRENT. >> A major portion of our development environment is based on XEN for >> testing and development. >> Therefor we realize PVHM is a work in progress, and we have built some >> VMs from it, they run exceptionally >> well, However our build environments refuse to build 9-STABLE on CURRENT >> PVHVM, or 10-CURRENT. >> Lastly Im sure theres a ton of users who would like to see this in 9.x or >> 9-STABLE >> >> > > OK, I misunderstood you since you responded in the thread and quoted some > of my post. > My blog post has nothing relevant to Xen and PVHM, and is specific to > setting up > a Google Summer of Code student on a 10-CURRENT environment. The FreeBSD > Xen > and PVHM developers will need to provide the details about their plans to > merge their changes to the 9-STABLE branch..... > that's something which I am not familiar with. > If we can get a diff of the work done against the master Id be happy to help backporting and testing > > > -- > Craig >