From owner-freebsd-hackers  Wed Feb  7 13:47:50 1996
Return-Path: owner-hackers
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id NAA29688
          for hackers-outgoing; Wed, 7 Feb 1996 13:47:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ref.tfs.com (ref.tfs.com [140.145.254.251])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id NAA29682
          for <hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>; Wed, 7 Feb 1996 13:47:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from julian@localhost) by ref.tfs.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) id NAA00355; Wed, 7 Feb 1996 13:46:48 -0800
From: Julian Elischer <julian@ref.tfs.com>
Message-Id: <199602072146.NAA00355@ref.tfs.com>
Subject: Re: PCI programming
To: hasty@rah.star-gate.com (Amancio Hasty Jr.)
Date: Wed, 7 Feb 1996 13:46:47 -0800 (PST)
Cc: dufault@hda.com, fwmiller@cs.UMD.EDU, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
In-Reply-To: <199602072122.NAA01129@rah.star-gate.com> from "Amancio Hasty Jr." at Feb 7, 96 01:22:50 pm
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24]
Content-Type: text
Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk

I've been coresponding with him..
it happens to fit in with what we did here at TFS a while ago.
(the physmem stuff) 
hopefully this time we can get it right because we won't have to be 
worried about backwards compatibility with an older version.


> 
> >>> Peter Dufault said:
>  > We forwarded this gentleman's private e-mail to the list.
>  > In general we ought to avoid this, and invite the originator to
>  > send to the list himself.
>  
> Sorry about that , I shall know better. Is just at least sometimes
> people like to send me e-mail because they  don't like to post on
> the mailing lists and most cases is because they are a bit intimidated
> and want to know if it is a reasonable question or that I just
> simply have the answer.
> 
> 	Regards,
> 	Amancio
> 
> 
>