From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 5 13:30:14 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68D1D37B401; Sat, 5 Apr 2003 13:30:14 -0800 (PST) Received: from rwcrmhc53.attbi.com (rwcrmhc53.attbi.com [204.127.198.39]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4CF043FA3; Sat, 5 Apr 2003 13:30:11 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from davep.freebsd@meduseld.net) Received: from baloo.meduseld.net (h00095b0c686b.ne.client2.attbi.com[66.30.120.27]) by rwcrmhc53.attbi.com (rwcrmhc53) with ESMTP id <20030405213010053002o1k4e>; Sat, 5 Apr 2003 21:30:11 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by baloo.meduseld.net (8.12.8p1/8.12.8) with ESMTP id h35LU5tR053276; Sat, 5 Apr 2003 16:30:06 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from davep.freebsd@meduseld.net) Date: Sat, 05 Apr 2003 16:30:05 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <20030405.163005.596525065.davep@meduseld.net> To: bmah@freebsd.org From: "David A. Panariti" In-Reply-To: <20030405202330.GA84040@intruder.bmah.org> References: <3E8E216C.2060009@earthlink.net> <200304050103.h35131154355@flip.jhs.private> <20030405202330.GA84040@intruder.bmah.org> X-Attribution: davep X-Mailer: Mew version 4.0.51 on XEmacs 21.4.12 (Portable Code) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: jhs@berklix.com cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 4.8R and $FreeBSD$ version tag expansion X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 05 Apr 2003 21:30:14 -0000 >>>>> "Bruce" == Bruce A Mah writes: Bruce> If memory serves me right, Julian Stacey wrote: Reference> >> > From: "David A. Gobeille" Date: Fri, 04 Apr >> > 2003 18:21:00 -0600 Message-id: <3E8E216C.2060009@earthlink.net> >> >> "David A. Gobeille" wrote: >> > I noticed that there were quite a few files with version ids of >> > '$FreeBSD$' when I ran mergemaster after an install of 4.8R. This >> > isn't >> >> I read tags were reworked. Prob. you'r working from old sources, & >> It'll rectify if you wait a day & then { refresh your CVS tree & >> re-export src/ } or { if src/ from a .iso, check your MD5, & refetch >> from local mirror if old }, then remake. Bruce> I think I explained this in a prior posting to this list, but what Bruce> happened was that the $FreeBSD$ CVS keywords didn't get expanded Bruce> the first time we tried to build a release. mergemaster hates Bruce> this, as the original poster discovered. For this and other Bruce> reasons, we considered this a showstopper and rebuilt the release; Bruce> when we did, we also needed to modify one file and slide its CVS Bruce> tag. Bruce> Users updating from sources (e.g. using cvsup or anon CVS) were Bruce> probably not affected by this. In confirmation, I updated from source on Apr 4 ~2pm EST and haven't seen any $FreeBSD$ ids in /etc/... >> PS I told re@ some hours back that there's no ftp> //ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ISO-IMAGES-i386/4.8/CHECKSUM.MD5 >> they looked: there is CHECKSUM.MD5 on ftp-master, but it's not made it >> over yet - the servers are very busy: waiting seems best solution :-) Bruce> And in my reply to you, I mentioned that I had already put the Bruce> contents of CHECKSUM.MD5 (for the i386 ISO images anyways) in the Bruce> 4.8 errata file, which is on the Web site. :-) Bruce> Cheers, Bruce> Bruce.