From owner-freebsd-security  Wed Jun 26  8: 7:33 2002
Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org
Received: from gw.nectar.cc (gw.nectar.cc [208.42.49.153])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED24C37B8BA
	for <freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG>; Wed, 26 Jun 2002 08:01:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from madman.nectar.cc (madman.nectar.cc [10.0.1.111])
	by gw.nectar.cc (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 7FF652F; Wed, 26 Jun 2002 10:01:30 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from madman.nectar.cc (localhost [IPv6:::1])
	by madman.nectar.cc (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id g5QF1UsE065693;
	Wed, 26 Jun 2002 10:01:30 -0500 (CDT)
	(envelope-from nectar@madman.nectar.cc)
Received: (from nectar@localhost)
	by madman.nectar.cc (8.12.3/8.12.3/Submit) id g5QF1UDk065692;
	Wed, 26 Jun 2002 10:01:30 -0500 (CDT)
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2002 10:01:30 -0500
From: "Jacques A. Vidrine" <nectar@FreeBSD.ORG>
To: Mike Tancsa <mike@sentex.net>
Cc: freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: OpenSSH Advisory (was Re: Much ado about nothing.)
Message-ID: <20020626150129.GE65626@madman.nectar.cc>
Mail-Followup-To: "Jacques A. Vidrine" <nectar@FreeBSD.org>,
	Mike Tancsa <mike@sentex.net>, freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG
References: <200206250248.g5P2mJLJ031907@cvs.openbsd.org> <20020625024401.GB43738@madman.nectar.cc> <200206250248.g5P2mJLJ031907@cvs.openbsd.org> <5.1.0.14.0.20020626103651.048ec778@marble.sentex.ca>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.0.20020626103651.048ec778@marble.sentex.ca>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i
X-Url: http://www.nectar.cc/
Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <freebsd-security.FreeBSD.ORG>
List-Archive: <http://docs.freebsd.org/mail/> (Web Archive)
List-Help: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=help> (List Instructions)
List-Subscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=subscribe%20freebsd-security>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=unsubscribe%20freebsd-security>
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

On Wed, Jun 26, 2002 at 10:40:05AM -0400, Mike Tancsa wrote:
> 
> Can someone confirm for me that the quote,
[snip]
> would imply that the version 2.9 in STABLE is not vulnerable ?

That does appear to be the case.

Cheers,
-- 
Jacques A. Vidrine <n@nectar.cc>                 http://www.nectar.cc/
NTT/Verio SME          .     FreeBSD UNIX     .       Heimdal Kerberos
jvidrine@verio.net     .  nectar@FreeBSD.org  .          nectar@kth.se

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message