From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 4 10:29:58 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42756336 for ; Mon, 4 Mar 2013 10:29:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from steve@sohara.org) Received: from uk1rly2283.eechost.net (relay01a.mail.uk1.eechost.net [217.69.40.75]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6E24AB5 for ; Mon, 4 Mar 2013 10:29:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [31.186.37.179] (helo=smtp.marelmo.com) by uk1rly2283.eechost.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UCSKd-00059h-Id for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 04 Mar 2013 10:09:19 +0000 Received: from [192.168.63.1] (helo=steve.marelmo.com) by smtp.marelmo.com with smtp (Exim 4.80.1 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1UCSKR-000NJJ-Fg for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 04 Mar 2013 10:09:07 +0000 Date: Mon, 4 Mar 2013 10:08:37 +0000 From: Steve O'Hara-Smith To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Confused by restore(8) man page example Message-Id: <20130304100837.41f5084d9b0c5817957a6ed1@sohara.org> In-Reply-To: <4861.1362390444@server1.tristatelogic.com> References: <4861.1362390444@server1.tristatelogic.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.3.0 (GTK+ 2.24.6; amd64-portbld-freebsd9.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Auth-Info: 15567@permanet.ie (plain) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Mar 2013 10:29:58 -0000 On Mon, 04 Mar 2013 01:47:24 -0800 "Ronald F. Guilmette" wrote: > > > In the man page for restore(8) I see the following: > > The -r flag ... can be detrimental to one's health if > not used carefully (not to mention the disk). An example: > > newfs /dev/da0s1a > mount /dev/da0s1a /mnt > cd /mnt > > restore rf /dev/sa0 > > > Personally, I utterly fail to see what point the author is attempting > to illustrate with the above example. I mean what part of this, exactly, > may be "detrimental to one's health" ? It's an enigma to me. There's nothing wrong with the example. I think "An example:" should be in a new paragraph to make it clear that it is not related to the warning. The detrimental effects cut in when you use -r on a filesystem that is not pristine, or at least in the expected state for restoring an incremental dump. -- Steve O'Hara-Smith