From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 28 23:35:15 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E5D8106568A for ; Tue, 28 Oct 2008 23:35:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsam@ipt.ru) Received: from services.ipt.ru (services.ipt.ru [194.62.233.110]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B38918FC1E for ; Tue, 28 Oct 2008 23:35:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsam@ipt.ru) Received: from [85.173.16.209] (helo=moosa) by services.ipt.ru with esmtpa (Exim 4.54 (FreeBSD)) id 1Kuy5g-000BQG-HT; Wed, 29 Oct 2008 02:35:12 +0300 To: nox@FreeBSD.ORG (Juergen Lock) References: <20081028231946.GA72682@hub.freebsd.org> From: Boris Samorodov Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 02:35:11 +0300 In-Reply-To: <20081028231946.GA72682@hub.freebsd.org> (Juergen Lock's message of "Tue\, 28 Oct 2008 23\:19\:46 +0000") Message-ID: <02325568@ipt.ru> User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.2 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Subject: Re: flash10, updated linux-{curl, openssl} etc ports... (resent w/o attachments) X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 23:35:15 -0000 On Tue, 28 Oct 2008 23:19:46 +0000 Juergen Lock wrote: [...] > linux_base-f7 and then unpacked the f7 curl rpm and dependencies using > rpm2cpio piped to tar xfv - ... I'm not sure if it's any difference but usually we use a pipe to "cpio -id". > Ok and now something more general for the emulation folks: Now that > fc4 seems to be eol'd, what do we do to get updated linux-{curl,openssl} > etc ports from f7 (or f8?) for the folks that _can_ use them? (like, > RELENG_7 and above.) Its not only that they are useful for flash10, > its also because of security updates... (No I haven't actually checked if > there _were_ advisories for one of these since fc4, its just not really > unlikely. :) I have a bunch of new linux-f8 ports which should be introduced after the ports tree slush is over. WBR -- bsam