From owner-freebsd-hackers Thu Aug 19 16:19: 5 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from shell.futuresouth.com (shell.futuresouth.com [198.78.58.28]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F13915099 for ; Thu, 19 Aug 1999 16:19:01 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from fullermd@futuresouth.com) Received: (from fullermd@localhost) by shell.futuresouth.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id SAA14692; Thu, 19 Aug 1999 18:17:20 -0500 (CDT) Date: Thu, 19 Aug 1999 18:17:20 -0500 From: "Matthew D. Fuller" To: "Daniel C. Sobral" Cc: Larry Lile , hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, dlane@yahoo.com Subject: Re: async v. sync v. default mode on ufs Message-ID: <19990819181720.C2131@futuresouth.com> References: <37BB92E3.3CE11E86@newsguy.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.3i In-Reply-To: <37BB92E3.3CE11E86@newsguy.com>; from Daniel C. Sobral on Thu, Aug 19, 1999 at 02:15:15PM +0900 X-OS: FreeBSD Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Thu, Aug 19, 1999 at 02:15:15PM +0900, a little birdie told me that Daniel C. Sobral remarked > Larry Lile wrote: > > > > /dev/wd0s1f on /var (asynchronous, local, noatime, synchronous, writes: > > sync 93 async 216) procfs on /proc (local) > > > > /var looks questionable... > > Indeed. :-) I'm still looking for a 'splanation for this one: /dev/da0s1a on / (local, synchronous, writes: sync 34 async 954) ^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^ I don't WANT async writes! -- Matthew Fuller (MF4839) | fullermd@over-yonder.net Unix Systems Administrator | fullermd@futuresouth.com Specializing in FreeBSD | http://www.over-yonder.net/ FutureSouth Communications | ISPHelp ISP Consulting "The only reason I'm burning my candle at both ends, is because I haven't figured out how to light the middle yet" To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message