From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org  Sun Apr 16 20:11:05 2017
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9A99D41E12
 for <freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org>;
 Sun, 16 Apr 2017 20:11:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu)
Received: from home.opsec.eu (home.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200::1])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9E1C41DD4
 for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Sun, 16 Apr 2017 20:11:05 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu)
Received: from pi by home.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.87 (FreeBSD))
 (envelope-from <lists@opsec.eu>)
 id 1czqVn-0007pZ-1E; Sun, 16 Apr 2017 22:11:07 +0200
Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2017 22:11:07 +0200
From: Kurt Jaeger <lists@opsec.eu>
To: Dmytro Bilokha <dmytro@posteo.net>
Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Need for commit (new port)
Message-ID: <20170416201106.GB74780@home.opsec.eu>
References: <20170416173109.GA3679@wstan>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20170416173109.GA3679@wstan>
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-ports>,
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2017 20:11:05 -0000

Hi!

> May some kind committer commit the new port:
> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215708
> 
> It is a port for the Payara Application Service (http://www.payara.fish/)
> which is derived from the Glassfish (https://glassfish.java.net/).

Done. May I ask about the difference between glassfish (now at 4.1.2
upstream, 4.1 in the ports), wildfly, jboss and all the other EEs out
there ?

I really doubt that there's so much improvement over 110M+ large
distfiles that each of those EE java blobs can bring ?

Wouldn't it be sensible to just fix others instead of re-inventing
the wheel all over ?

-- 
pi@opsec.eu            +49 171 3101372                         3 years to go !