Date: Mon, 03 Jul 2017 23:15:48 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: x11@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 220444] x11-servers/xorg-server crashes on attempt to play a video using VDPAU Message-ID: <bug-220444-7141-KQgWeUYdpK@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-220444-7141@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-220444-7141@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D220444 --- Comment #9 from Mikhail Teterin <mi@FreeBSD.org> --- (In reply to Jan Beich from comment #8) > Maybe see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Direct_Rendering_Infrastructure#D= RI3 Thanks! Looks like I am not missing anything -- the DRI3 may make coding th= ings up easier for developers, but whatever already works, works just as well. My own test with mplayer using different video-output settings (-vo foo) wi= th the same video-file is: vdpau: 108.792u 3.347s 9:30.43 19.6% 3934+697k 3+35io 2056pf+0w xv: 107.773u 3.170s 9:29.83 19.4% 3936+697k 3+35io 2056pf+0w gl_nosw: 107.862u 3.402s 9:29.85 19.5% 3935+697k 3+35io 2056pf+0w x11: 108.078u 3.252s 9:29.82 19.5% 3943+699k 3+35io 2056pf+0w sdl: 107.477u 3.406s 9:29.80 19.4% 3950+700k 3+35io 2056pf+0w Thank you for your help, Jan. Maybe, DRI should be limited to 2 automatical= ly, unless whatever functionality is necessary in kernel is detected at run-tim= e? > https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D1210729 Neither the age of the bug, nor the treatment of the impatient comments the= re (labeling them as spam?) are encouraging :( > layers.acceleration.force-enabled=3Dtrue may provide better compositing No obvious difference, unfortunately... --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-220444-7141-KQgWeUYdpK>