From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 9 14:25:35 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66C6F16A4BF for ; Tue, 9 Sep 2003 14:25:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.pcnet.com (mail.pcnet.com [204.213.232.4]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 478CD43FE5 for ; Tue, 9 Sep 2003 14:25:34 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from eischen@vigrid.com) Received: from mail.pcnet.com (mail.pcnet.com [204.213.232.4]) by mail.pcnet.com (8.12.8/8.12.1) with ESMTP id h89LPWtp021103; Tue, 9 Sep 2003 17:25:32 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2003 17:25:32 -0400 (EDT) From: Daniel Eischen X-Sender: eischen@pcnet5.pcnet.com To: Dan Langille In-Reply-To: <3F5E0A6D.191.1AF2F500@localhost> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: Jesse Guardiani cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: KSE howto? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: deischen@freebsd.org List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Sep 2003 21:25:35 -0000 On Tue, 9 Sep 2003, Dan Langille wrote: > On 9 Sep 2003 at 17:09, Daniel Eischen wrote: > > > On Tue, 9 Sep 2003, Jesse Guardiani wrote: > > > > > Howdy list, > > > > > > Is there a KSE howto guide anywhere? > > > > > > I'm thinking about updating my FreeBSD 5.1-RELEASE > > > system to -CURRENT and compiling XFree, KDE, MySQL, > > > and Apache2 with KSE support, just for fun. > > > > > > But I don't know how to enable KSE support at compile > > > time... > > > > It will be easier to wait for ports@ to work out the > > issue with -pthread being removed. Then you should > > be able to set PTHREAD_LIBS=-lkse in /etc/make.conf > > and rebuild your ports. Until then, libmap.conf(5) > > is the easiest solution. > > Oh, well, perhaps my answer isn't correct after all... :( Sure it is skipper. It's correct for the second part of my answer. -- Dan Eischen