From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Jul 11 20:01:28 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BB19B9265D for ; Mon, 11 Jul 2016 20:01:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zeising@freebsd.org) Received: from mail.daemonic.se (cloud.daemonic.se [185.34.0.151]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B50031E3B for ; Mon, 11 Jul 2016 20:01:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zeising@freebsd.org) Received: from cloud.daemonic.se (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mail.daemonic.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3rpGFH1sQJz27LY; Mon, 11 Jul 2016 20:01:23 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at daemonic.se Received: from mail.daemonic.se ([127.0.0.1]) (using TLS with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256) by cloud.daemonic.se (mailscanner.daemonic.se [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10587) with ESMTPS id GK_2PBy318h8; Mon, 11 Jul 2016 20:01:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [IPv6:2001:470:dca9:2::3] (celes.daemonic.se [IPv6:2001:470:dca9:2::3]) by mail.daemonic.se (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3rpGFG5XFFz27C0; Mon, 11 Jul 2016 20:01:22 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: What happens to the ports for platform i386 To: Ivan Klymenko References: <20160711115553.0be69add@nonamehost.local> <20160711223245.2d6103c5@nonamehost.local> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org From: Niclas Zeising Message-ID: Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2016 22:01:11 +0200 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160711223245.2d6103c5@nonamehost.local> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2016 20:01:28 -0000 On 2016-07-11 21:32, Ivan Klymenko wrote: > On Mon, 11 Jul 2016 21:16:07 +0200 > Niclas Zeising wrote: > >> On 07/11/16 10:55, Ivan Klymenko wrote: >>> Hi all. >>> >>> Dear maintainer and committers. >>> Please check what you are doing before heading to the world. >>> What happens to the i386 platform? >>> If it is so difficult to keep it clean it all from the official site >>> https://www.freebsd.org/platforms/ >>> i386 platform almost everywhere and is constantly broken. >>> cross-platform build, including ports: >>> >> >> [snip list] >> >>> >>> And most importantly - as if no one notices or is indifferent to it, >>> what is happening in FreeBSD. >>> >>> Install FreeBSD to their workplace and use it - what you are doing >>> for yourself - or do not use and do not do anything for FreeBSD. >>> >>> Thank you for understanding. >> >> Hi! >> I tried a couple of the ports on the list without any issues. I >> suspect that the issue is in your environment or poudriere setup. >> I'm running a FreeBSD 11-BETA5 i386 jail with poudriere on top of a >> amd64 host. Is this the same setup you are using? >> Regards! > > I don`t have FreeBSD 11-BETA5 > I have FreeBSD 11-BETA1 > ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/releases/amd64/11.0-BETA1/ > ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/releases/i386/11.0-BETA1/ > I take official snapshots and releases for poudriere that there were no > differences. > I do not have at their disposal FreeBSD 11-BETA5 release or snapshot. > In the previous version FreeBSD 11-ALPHA6 these problems are not > observed. I have ALPHA5, not BETA5, my mistake. I have to create a BETA jail from the snapshots, and try myself, it could be that something broke when doing the branch. I still suspect your environment though, it seems like somewhere along the line, the fact that you are compiling for i386 and not amd64 is getting lost. I am still not sure this is not just an issue in your environment, but I have to test more. Regards! -- Niclas