From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 17 06:30:53 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D32D1065672 for ; Thu, 17 Feb 2011 06:30:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from prvs=002215dcaf=johnl@iecc.com) Received: from gal.iecc.com (gal.iecc.com [64.57.183.53]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E893E8FC13 for ; Thu, 17 Feb 2011 06:30:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 75057 invoked from network); 17 Feb 2011 06:04:11 -0000 Received: from mail1.iecc.com (64.57.183.56) by mail1.iecc.com with QMQP; 17 Feb 2011 06:04:11 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:cc:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:vbr-info; s=bae1.4d5cba5b.k1102; i=johnl@user.iecc.com; bh=WO//EiwmVOdBnAz5Z/49izzPRN1DuuihyEudttk2C5M=; b=fre+CkTPrawAKwU4VdtE/Nt4GvdTUZTIandHOXvwL+H1RFC4ieLsoF26PiIG5eVReJm+XzhrkV/CrCbOIme18ukhSZIZh8jeVjtG1MBDotGj9EnLzdRAaEAZTd9IucoNHFNlgSrWrVIelXWispwLkdo/qWLCqm5uofES/OBeAMU= VBR-Info: md=iecc.com; mc=all; mv=dwl.spamhaus.org Date: 17 Feb 2011 06:04:11 -0000 Message-ID: <20110217060411.47840.qmail@joyce.lan> From: John Levine To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <525C9A76-6D51-4FE9-834B-3BA39192822F@vicor.com> Organization: X-Headerized: yes Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Cc: dteske@vicor.com Subject: Re: google browser? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2011 06:30:53 -0000 >I've heard certain noises on this list that the current >port-maintainer of Chromium has dropped the ball (not my words, just >paraphrasing the sentiment from the below thread). That's too bad. I'm using Chromium 6.0.472.63 from the ports which works quite nicely, although I'm aware of the security issues. It has the same plugin interface as Firefox so Flash and Java work reasonably well. It is indeed much faster than Firefox. R's, John