From owner-svn-ports-all@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 5 03:36:16 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1033) id 08B7C427; Wed, 5 Mar 2014 03:36:16 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2014 03:36:16 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev To: Martin Wilke Subject: Re: svn commit: r344402 - head/math/primegen Message-ID: <20140305033615.GB91204@FreeBSD.org> References: <201402151509.s1FF9VUc063590@svn.freebsd.org> <20140305025848.GA91204@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.22 (2013-10-16) Cc: "svn-ports-head@FreeBSD.org" , Danilo Egea Gondolfo , "svn-ports-all@FreeBSD.org" , ports-committers@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Mar 2014 03:36:16 -0000 On Wed, Mar 05, 2014 at 11:21:20AM +0800, Martin Wilke wrote: > No, there is no such rule to enable/disable it. If it's not documented in the PH yet, then it should. I'll add it to my TODO list. > It is still maintainer/committer choice. I think I've given reasons clear and valid enough to strongly prefer vocal installations. Pessimizing debugging, leaving users unaware of what's going on is bad, and we should not encourage it. In fact, most of the times muted commands are there not by choice, but due to lack of initial thought of implications of doind so. ./danfe