From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 17 18:25:00 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0494737B404 for ; Tue, 17 Jun 2003 18:25:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from Shenton.org (23.ebbed1.client.atlantech.net [209.190.235.35]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7874243FBD for ; Tue, 17 Jun 2003 18:24:54 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from chris@mail.hq.nasa.gov) Received: (qmail 10941 invoked by uid 1000); 18 Jun 2003 01:21:30 -0000 To: Don Lewis References: <200306161718.h5GHHxM7049401@gw.catspoiler.org> From: Chris Shenton Date: 17 Jun 2003 21:21:30 -0400 In-Reply-To: <200306161718.h5GHHxM7049401@gw.catspoiler.org> Message-ID: <87adcgb2p1.fsf@PECTOPAH.shenton.org> Lines: 5 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii cc: current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: qmail uses 100% cpu after FreeBSD-5.0 to 5.1 upgrade X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2003 01:25:00 -0000 Don Lewis writes: > Thanks for doing the testing. I just committed this patch. Seems fine here too -- many thanks.