From owner-freebsd-current Sun Apr 2 13:22:58 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from freebsd.dk (freebsd.dk [212.242.42.178]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F35D37B990 for ; Sun, 2 Apr 2000 13:22:53 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sos@freebsd.dk) Received: (from sos@localhost) by freebsd.dk (8.9.3/8.9.1) id WAA84522; Sun, 2 Apr 2000 22:22:40 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from sos) From: Soren Schmidt Message-Id: <200004022022.WAA84522@freebsd.dk> Subject: Re: Deadlock with vinum raid5 In-Reply-To: <20000402221829.A25555@cicely8.cicely.de> from Bernd Walter at "Apr 2, 2000 10:18:29 pm" To: ticso@cicely.de (Bernd Walter) Date: Sun, 2 Apr 2000 22:22:39 +0200 (CEST) Cc: bright@wintelcom.net (Alfred Perlstein), vallo@matti.ee (Vallo Kallaste), freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL54 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG It seems Bernd Walter wrote: > On Sun, Apr 02, 2000 at 09:39:36PM +0200, Soren Schmidt wrote: > > I dont think vinum is/was usable under -current at least not the > > RAID5 stuff, its broken, and some of it is because greg is not > > up to date with what -current looks like these days. > > Can you please explain what have massivly changed in current that relates > to vinum? The changes done by phk to seperate out the io stuff from struct buf. -Søren To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message