From owner-freebsd-questions Tue Jul 27 20:29:11 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from WEBBSD1.turnaround.com.au (webbsd1.turnaround.com.au [203.39.138.49]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80F36153C9 for ; Tue, 27 Jul 1999 20:29:03 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from A_Johns@TurnAround.com.au) Received: from tasajohns (dhcp64.turnaround.com.au [192.168.1.64]) by WEBBSD1.turnaround.com.au (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id NAA06915; Wed, 28 Jul 1999 13:49:37 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from A_Johns@TurnAround.com.au) From: "Andrew Johns" To: "Mark Bannar-Martin" , "freebsd-questions" Subject: RE: Dual CPU hardware Newbie question Date: Wed, 28 Jul 1999 13:27:01 +1000 Message-ID: <001501bed8a9$0e19b130$4001a8c0@tasajohns.turnaround.com.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 8.5, Build 4.71.2173.0 In-Reply-To: <379E5A43.BA1A7423@pearson-college.uwc.ca> Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3 Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG A 486 could easily do this for a small number of people - remember, the bottleneck here is the ethernet speed (approx 6-700kB/sec max for 10Meg ethernet), which is slower than the speed with which the PC can read data from the hard disk. Remembering that we are approaching 2000, however, you'd want to be certain that the motherboard is compliant, so a low-end Pentium is what you'd probably want. As for the FreeBSD version, I'd pick a -STABLE, probably 3.2 at the moment. HTH AJ > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG > [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG]On Behalf Of Mark > Bannar-Martin > Sent: Wednesday, 28 July 1999 11:18 > To: freebsd-questions > Subject: Dual CPU hardware Newbie question > > > I have searched the lists but I did not find a satisfactory > posting for > the following question: > > I am looking to purchase a dual cpu machine to run FreeBSD. I > have only > used 2.2.8 so far but I like it. I want to spend at most > $2000. I am not > interested in graphics and want to use this machine as a Samba server > for a small workgroup of Win9x machines. > > Any hardware recommendations would be much appreciated as > would the best > FreeBSD release to use for rock solid platform. > Perhaps the most important decisions for me are: > 1. Single or dual CPU > 2. IDE or SCSI hard drive > > Thank you, > Mark. > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message