From owner-freebsd-bugs Thu Oct 5 13:50: 5 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B84037B66D for ; Thu, 5 Oct 2000 13:50:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.9.3/8.9.2) id NAA45343; Thu, 5 Oct 2000 13:50:03 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2000 13:50:03 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200010052050.NAA45343@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Cc: From: Chris Faulhaber Subject: Re: misc/21775: Add info on port usage to services Reply-To: Chris Faulhaber Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org The following reply was made to PR misc/21775; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Chris Faulhaber To: Dann Lunsford Cc: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@freebsd.org Subject: Re: misc/21775: Add info on port usage to services Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2000 16:44:52 -0400 On Thu, Oct 05, 2000 at 01:24:21PM -0700, Dann Lunsford wrote: > >Description: > > add usage info to /etc/services. TCP port 98 is officially tacnews but is > used by Red Hat Linux's linuxconf tool as well. I've seen a lot of port > scans for this, and thought it would be good to have this noted in > services. > > -tacnews 98/tcp #TAC News > +tacnews 98/tcp #TAC News; Red Hat linuxconf Did IANA officially assign this port to RedHat? And do we really want to start adding a bunch of cruft into /etc/services about systems using unassigned ports? -- Chris D. Faulhaber - jedgar@fxp.org - jedgar@FreeBSD.org -------------------------------------------------------- FreeBSD: The Power To Serve - http://www.FreeBSD.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message