From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 29 21:16:35 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16DC816A558; Sat, 29 Jan 2005 21:16:35 +0000 (GMT) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (CPE0050040655c8-CM00111ae02aac.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com [69.199.47.57]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF1B743D2F; Sat, 29 Jan 2005 21:16:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 3B17A522B3; Sat, 29 Jan 2005 13:16:34 -0800 (PST) Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2005 13:16:34 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway To: Anton Berezin , Kris Kennaway , perl@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20050129211634.GB38050@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20050129202425.GA56998@heechee.tobez.org> <20050129205807.GA36637@xor.obsecurity.org> <20050129205940.GB56998@heechee.tobez.org> <20050129210352.GA36709@xor.obsecurity.org> <20050129210848.GC56998@heechee.tobez.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="8GpibOaaTibBMecb" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050129210848.GC56998@heechee.tobez.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Subject: Re: [HEADS UP] perl symlinks in /usr/bin will be gone X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2005 21:16:35 -0000 --8GpibOaaTibBMecb Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Jan 29, 2005 at 10:08:48PM +0100, Anton Berezin wrote: > [ok, returning it to ports@ too, there might be some interest] >=20 > On Sat, Jan 29, 2005 at 01:03:52PM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > On Sat, Jan 29, 2005 at 09:59:40PM +0100, Anton Berezin wrote: > >=20 > > > > BTW, this goes beyond what I was asking for, which was just "remove > > > > the dangling symlinks when the package is deinstalled [because they > > > > are now nonfunctional]" > > >=20 > > > True. Do you oppose to this change, and if yes, why? > >=20 > > It seems pretty disruptive, especially to users of the -stable branch, > > and I'm not sure there's a good reason for doing it. >=20 > The thing is, that the whole idea of touching /usr/bin at all made sense > when perl was in the base system and we needed a way to "replace" it > with a version from ports. >=20 > Since we don't have it in the base for quite some time, there is no good > reason to continue cluttering /usr/bin with those symlinks. So this > needs to be done eventually, and this seemed as good time as any to > introduce this change. Maybe we should continue to create (and also remove) the links for 5.x and try the change out in 6.x to see what kind of an impact is has. Kris --8GpibOaaTibBMecb Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFB+/0xWry0BWjoQKURAvPLAKCnDksuVl/CAnbQolUqVEH0/EeEcgCg5GZt scoGujJhXxiR8wXVcP0FajA= =gMRF -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --8GpibOaaTibBMecb--