Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2001 10:34:15 +0100 From: Simon Dick <simond@irrelevant.org> To: Roger Merritt <mcrogerm@stjohn.ac.th> Cc: Kory Hamzeh <kory@avatar.com>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Is SMC EZ Card 10/100 PCI 1244-TX supported on 4.3? Message-ID: <20010911103415.B441@irrelevant.org> In-Reply-To: <3.0.6.32.20010911162656.007ecdc0@stjohn.stjohn.ac.th>; from mcrogerm@stjohn.ac.th on Tue, Sep 11, 2001 at 04:26:56PM %2B0700 References: <20010909212210.D25560-100000@www.stelesys.com> <004601c13999$4320ff20$14ce21c7@avatar.com> <3.0.6.32.20010911162656.007ecdc0@stjohn.stjohn.ac.th>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Sep 11, 2001 at 04:26:56PM +0700, Roger Merritt wrote: > At 06:38 PM 9/9/01 -0700, you wrote: > >It does. It is the rl0 device. Make sure you add stuff in you rc.conf in the > >ifconfig_rl0="...." to manually select the media type or you'll get sucky > >performance. I like the 3com enet cards better, but that's just my opinion. > > > >If the system doesn't detect the SMC card, you need to play with the PNP > >settings in the BIOS. > > > >Kory > > > > > > This is interesting. Where do you find this information? I just took a look > through LINT and found no r10 device anywhere, nor any mention of SMC > cards. My SMC EZ PCI cards were installed on the basis of being NE2000 > compatible and they've always registered as ed devices. I've always thought > my network performance should be better, but fortunately my LAN is small > enough that it's not an issue. He said rl0 (R L 0) not r10, which could explain why you couldn't find anything :) -- Simon Dick simond@irrelevant.org "Why do I get this urge to go bowling everytime I see Tux?" To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010911103415.B441>