From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 6 10:29:57 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB51616A420 for ; Mon, 6 Mar 2006 10:29:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from roberto@keltia.freenix.fr) Received: from tara.freenix.org (keltia.freenix.org [82.224.56.155]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C6ED43D5D for ; Mon, 6 Mar 2006 10:29:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from roberto@keltia.freenix.fr) Received: by tara.freenix.org (Postfix/TLS, from userid 101) id 73779E; Mon, 6 Mar 2006 11:29:21 +0100 (CET) Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2006 11:29:21 +0100 From: Ollivier Robert To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20060306102921.GC21025@tara.freenix.org> References: <20060304173917.X61086@fledge.watson.org> <20060304180131.69997.qmail@web32709.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <20060305084713.GA97196@stud.fit.vutbr.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060305084713.GA97196@stud.fit.vutbr.cz> X-Operating-System: MacOS X / PowerBook G4 - FreeBSD 5.0 / 2x PIII/800 SMP User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Subject: Re: Subversion? (Re: HEADS UP: Importing csup into base) X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Mar 2006 10:29:58 -0000 According to Divacky Roman: > I do agree that cvs has its drawbacks but there is OpenCVS (cvs > reimplementation by openbsd folks) which seems to be actively maintained and > its authors promised things like atomic commits etc. When ? Just having atomic commits is not enough. If you take the HEAD of cvs right now (1.12.*), you get a "commit id" generated for all commits. > I think that switch from gnu cvs to opencvs is painless and should be done > (once the opencvs is in usable state) because VCS migration is too heavy to switch to just CVS+epsilon. > 1) its actively maintained > 2) its BSD licensed > 3) might have some features gnu cvs doesnt have "might" and "when" are more important and they kill opencvs right now. -- Ollivier ROBERT -=- FreeBSD: The Power to Serve! -=- roberto@keltia.freenix.fr Darwin snuadh.freenix.org Kernel Version 7.9.0: Wed Mar 30 20:11:17 PST 2005