From owner-svn-src-all@freebsd.org Mon Dec 19 19:02:54 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-all@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3307EC88D8E; Mon, 19 Dec 2016 19:02:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dim@FreeBSD.org) Received: from tensor.andric.com (tensor.andric.com [IPv6:2001:7b8:3a7:1:2d0:b7ff:fea0:8c26]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "tensor.andric.com", Issuer "COMODO RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ECC581567; Mon, 19 Dec 2016 19:02:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dim@FreeBSD.org) Received: from [IPv6:2001:7b8:3a7::edad:7930:572d:abe] (unknown [IPv6:2001:7b8:3a7:0:edad:7930:572d:abe]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by tensor.andric.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B8E5441D4E; Mon, 19 Dec 2016 20:02:50 +0100 (CET) Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_D7AC963E-59B0-4A18-8480-32507CCD267D"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\)) Subject: Re: svn commit: r310171 - head/sys/sys From: Dimitry Andric In-Reply-To: Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2016 20:02:42 +0100 Cc: Ravi Pokala , Sepherosa Ziehau , src-committers , "svn-src-all@freebsd.org" , "svn-src-head@freebsd.org" Message-Id: <0C6B935C-496B-4EF4-963F-95286CBA45BA@FreeBSD.org> References: <201612161949.uBGJnMol059217@repo.freebsd.org> <9BD5034F-55A6-48F6-A391-A0877FF49702@panasas.com> To: Warner Losh X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124) X-BeenThere: svn-src-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "SVN commit messages for the entire src tree \(except for " user" and " projects" \)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2016 19:02:54 -0000 --Apple-Mail=_D7AC963E-59B0-4A18-8480-32507CCD267D Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On 19 Dec 2016, at 19:58, Warner Losh wrote: >=20 > On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 1:39 AM, Ravi Pokala wrote: >> -----Original Message----- >>> From: on behalf of Sepherosa = Ziehau >>> Date: 2016-12-18, Sunday at 23:02 >>> To: Dimitry Andric >>> Cc: , , = >>> Subject: Re: svn commit: r310171 - head/sys/sys >>>=20 >>> The following patch unbreaks the LINT builds on amd64 for me after = this commit: >>> https://people.freebsd.org/~sephe/geom_sscanf.diff >>=20 >> Wouldn't it be better to use the SCN macros? >=20 > Are there other precedence for avoiding the SCN macros in the tree as > well, or is this new art? I personally don't have anything against using the PRI or SCN macros, but traditionally there has been some backlash against it, if I recall correctly. It also requires including either or , depending on circumstance or preference. -Dimitry --Apple-Mail=_D7AC963E-59B0-4A18-8480-32507CCD267D Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.30 iEYEARECAAYFAlhYLtoACgkQsF6jCi4glqMQSQCgh5lW/6sUOUx9BCZdXXCtkqaI hLQAnRonSXarpfNVM5K65bvhxOQji+2j =yv1T -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Apple-Mail=_D7AC963E-59B0-4A18-8480-32507CCD267D--