From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 20 18:02:49 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 054FD37B401 for ; Sun, 20 Apr 2003 18:02:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from stork.mail.pas.earthlink.net (stork.mail.pas.earthlink.net [207.217.120.188]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4564443FFD for ; Sun, 20 Apr 2003 18:01:28 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from tlambert2@mindspring.com) Received: from pool0075.cvx21-bradley.dialup.earthlink.net ([209.179.192.75] helo=mindspring.com) by stork.mail.pas.earthlink.net with asmtp (SSLv3:RC4-MD5:128) (Exim 3.33 #1) id 197PgS-0001I6-00; Sun, 20 Apr 2003 18:01:25 -0700 Message-ID: <3EA34218.54596AA@mindspring.com> Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2003 17:58:00 -0700 From: Terry Lambert X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Scott Long References: <200304182047.h3IKlhIZ000817@number6.magda.ca> <3EA10351.3010001@btc.adaptec.com><3EA334F2.60409@btc.adaptec.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-ELNK-Trace: b1a02af9316fbb217a47c185c03b154d40683398e744b8a4ced197f76609200dba576725b7604e18350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c cc: arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: config(8) should check if a scheduler is selected X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2003 01:02:49 -0000 Scott Long wrote: > >> Since code to implement it has not magically appeared yet... > > =-) > > I'd be happy if someone took this up. If Terry can do it with > magical linker sets and virtual tables or whatever, that would be > great too. Until patches appear, I'm not too concerned on how > it's done. Is it going to sit still? Last I looked, new scheduler interfaces were being defined. The cost is going to be an extra function call and a pointer indirect for each scheduler function. Hope that's OK... -- Terry