From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 4 22:17:56 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 304A116A402 for ; Sun, 4 Mar 2007 22:17:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sean@cyberwang.net) Received: from spunkymail-a9.g.dreamhost.com (sd-green-bigip-202.dreamhost.com [208.97.132.202]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BDE113C441 for ; Sun, 4 Mar 2007 22:17:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sean@cyberwang.net) Received: from [10.0.1.2] (68-184-120-224.dhcp.smyr.ga.charter.com [68.184.120.224]) by spunkymail-a9.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 354D3207BD; Sun, 4 Mar 2007 14:17:55 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <45EB4584.1030008@cyberwang.net> Date: Sun, 04 Mar 2007 17:17:40 -0500 From: Sean Bryant User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (Windows/20070221) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: frzburn References: <2942dae0703031923q2887c59dh85f103bff424e7b7@mail.gmail.com> <2942dae0703040752w3e9d61e1v34b7f4ca97abac49@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <2942dae0703040752w3e9d61e1v34b7f4ca97abac49@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Ronald Klop Subject: Re: portsnap and cvsup for rebuilding world - Which one? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 04 Mar 2007 22:17:56 -0000 frzburn wrote: > Well, again, thanks for all your replies! =) > After all you told me, I guess this guides describes the right tools to use > and the right way for rebuilding world. > > http://www.bsdguides.org/guides/freebsd/beginners/update_freebsd.php > > Thanks! > > > frzburn > > > On 3/4/07, Ronald Klop wrote: >> >> >> On Sun, 04 Mar 2007 04:23:55 +0100, frzburn wrote: >> >> > Hi everyone, >> [cut some text] >> > So here come my questions: >> > Is portsnap syncing the sources correctly for rebuilding world, or must >> I >> > use cvsup? >> > If so, of what use is portsnap if I must use cvsup for synchronizing my >> > source? >> > >> > In fact, I'm just looking at the most up-to-date/approved/correct >> > technique/tool to synchronize my source for ``rebuilding world'' with >> the >> > latest sources from FreeBSD-6-STABLE. >> >> Read this. It tells you why portsnap is invented. And why cvsup/csup is >> still better for other things then ports. >> http://www.daemonology.net/portsnap/ >> >> Ronald. >> -- >> Ronald Klop >> Amsterdam, The Netherlands >> > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" It might be worth noting you can set KERNCONF in your make.conf and you can just do make kernel instead of make buildkernel && make installkernel. it just runs both for you. There's no difference it is just a shorter path (not much though).