Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 00:11:34 +0200 From: martinko <martinkov@pobox.sk> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: New category - ports/packages specific tools? Message-ID: <e4dimm$2a3$1@sea.gmane.org> In-Reply-To: <1147732701.9404.44.camel@ikaros.oook.cz> References: <20060515222815.GA2535@picobyte.net> <1147732701.9404.44.camel@ikaros.oook.cz>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Pav Lucistnik wrote: > Shaun Amott píše v po 15. 05. 2006 v 23:28 +0100: >> There are lots of nifty tools in ports for handling ports and packages. >> It would be nice if they were all in one, easy to find place. >> >> I think there are enough of these kind of ports to warrant a new >> category. What does everyone think about this? >> >> I'm not sure on a name yet -- "freebsd", "ports", "tools", and >> "portutils" are my initial ideas. >> >> Possible candidates for the new category: >> >> devel/portcheckout >> devel/portlint >> devel/portmk >> devel/porttools >> misc/porteasy >> misc/portell >> security/portaudit >> security/portaudit-db >> sysutils/newportsversioncheck >> sysutils/pkg-orphan >> sysutils/pkg_cutleaves >> sysutils/pkg_install >> sysutils/pkg_install-devel >> sysutils/pkg_remove >> sysutils/pkg_rmleaves >> sysutils/pkg_trackinst >> sysutils/pkg_tree >> sysutils/pkgfe >> sysutils/port-authoring-tools >> sysutils/port-maintenance-tools >> sysutils/portbrowser >> sysutils/portdowngrade >> sysutils/portmanager >> sysutils/portmaster >> sysutils/portsearch >> sysutils/portsman >> sysutils/portsnap >> sysutils/portupgrade > > 28 is way too little to warrant a category. Plus you're missing a good > name for it. > "portutils" is not bad and "port(s)-mgmt" even better. and another candidate would be sysutils/bpm. m.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?e4dimm$2a3$1>