From owner-p4-projects@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Feb  8 13:11:38 2006
Return-Path: <owner-p4-projects@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: p4-projects@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: p4-projects@freebsd.org
Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 32767)
	id 61CDA16A423; Wed,  8 Feb 2006 13:11:38 +0000 (GMT)
X-Original-To: perforce@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: perforce@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E54D16A420
	for <perforce@freebsd.org>; Wed,  8 Feb 2006 13:11:38 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from wsalamon@computer.org)
Received: from repoman.freebsd.org (repoman.freebsd.org [216.136.204.115])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB00943D46
	for <perforce@freebsd.org>; Wed,  8 Feb 2006 13:11:37 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from wsalamon@computer.org)
Received: from repoman.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by repoman.freebsd.org (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id k18DBbCJ092462
	for <perforce@freebsd.org>; Wed, 8 Feb 2006 13:11:37 GMT
	(envelope-from wsalamon@computer.org)
Received: (from perforce@localhost)
	by repoman.freebsd.org (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id k18DBbd9092459
	for perforce@freebsd.org; Wed, 8 Feb 2006 13:11:37 GMT
	(envelope-from wsalamon@computer.org)
Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2006 13:11:37 GMT
Message-Id: <200602081311.k18DBbd9092459@repoman.freebsd.org>
X-Authentication-Warning: repoman.freebsd.org: perforce set sender to
	wsalamon@computer.org using -f
From: Wayne Salamon <wsalamon@FreeBSD.org>
To: Perforce Change Reviews <perforce@freebsd.org>
Cc: 
Subject: PERFORCE change 91394 for review
X-BeenThere: p4-projects@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: p4 projects tree changes <p4-projects.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/p4-projects>,
	<mailto:p4-projects-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/p4-projects>
List-Post: <mailto:p4-projects@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:p4-projects-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/p4-projects>,
	<mailto:p4-projects-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Feb 2006 13:11:39 -0000

http://perforce.freebsd.org/chv.cgi?CH=91394

Change 91394 by wsalamon@gretsch on 2006/02/08 13:11:28

	Add items about clarifiying the interaction of naflags,
	current audit state, and what userspace might need to
	do. Also add item about kernel's audit state indicators.

Affected files ...

.. //depot/projects/trustedbsd/audit3/notes/TODO_audit.txt#5 edit

Differences ...

==== //depot/projects/trustedbsd/audit3/notes/TODO_audit.txt#5 (text+ko) ====

@@ -75,3 +75,18 @@
 kernel event mapping.  Make the synchronization code a library function in
 OpenBSM so that the same code can be used in both auditd and the audit
 test suite.
+
+- Determine what the correct behavior should be for processes that
+are started before audit is enabled: Should they be audited based
+on naflags AFTER audit is enabled, or do they not get audited.
+
+- For programs that set the audit masks for authenticated users
+(login, sshd, etc.) need to consider the audit off vs. audit
+disabled (a temporary condition) state. Should the flags for
+the process be set in the disabled state but not the off state?
+
+- Review the kernel audit_enabled and audit_suspended flags, making
+sure they are used consistently, and they map to the exposed state
+(AUC_DISABLED, AUC_AUDITING, and  AUC_NOAUDIT).
+
+- Clearly document whatever is decided for the three items above.