From owner-freebsd-hackers Sun Mar 12 14:14:51 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mimer.webgiro.com (mimer.webgiro.com [212.209.29.5]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C279A37BD15; Sun, 12 Mar 2000 14:14:45 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from abial@webgiro.com) Received: by mimer.webgiro.com (Postfix, from userid 66) id 327D62DC09; Sun, 12 Mar 2000 23:19:07 +0100 (CET) Received: by mx.webgiro.com (Postfix, from userid 1001) id D1D7B7811; Sun, 12 Mar 2000 23:10:13 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx.webgiro.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF9E610E16; Sun, 12 Mar 2000 23:10:13 +0100 (CET) Date: Sun, 12 Mar 2000 23:10:13 +0100 (CET) From: Andrzej Bialecki To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Cc: Kris Kennaway , freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, jkh@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Getting CPU usage in FreeBSD In-Reply-To: <16178.952891246@zippy.cdrom.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sun, 12 Mar 2000, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote: > > I'm definitely for it... If I can get permission from Jordan, perhaps the > > attached patches can make it into upcoming release. > > I think it's a fine idea, I'm just not sure one day before release > is the time to be talking about it. It should have been raised > before now. :( I understand your concern. I don't think the sky will fall on our heads if these patches will be integrated after the release. :-) They are more like a convenience, not a must. Andrzej Bialecki // WebGiro AB, Sweden (http://www.webgiro.com) // ------------------------------------------------------------------- // ------ FreeBSD: The Power to Serve. http://www.freebsd.org -------- // --- Small & Embedded FreeBSD: http://www.freebsd.org/~picobsd/ ---- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message